Suggestion: Royal Full House

Discuss Triplejack Poker here.

Suggestion: Royal Full House

Postby DaFlush on Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:20 pm

Royal full house (only thing that can beat royal flush) is like:

3 hearts, 2 diamonds
2 hearts, 3 diamonds
3 spades, 2 clubs
3 clubs, 2 spades
-------------------------
Please read this :p
DaFlush
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:18 pm

Re: Suggestion: Royal Full House

Postby SphygmomanometeR on Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:58 pm

Good day!!!!

I don't think that would be appropriate since we are playing a "Texas Hold Em" type of a game...Royal Flush would be the highest and the strongest hand any player/players can have...I dont think some players would agree on that...
By the way what do you mean by having 2s and 3s? Let us hear your ideas and thoughts!!!

More Power :s: :h: :d: :c:
"Don't take life so seriously....have FUN...ENJOY every minute of it"
User avatar
SphygmomanometeR
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:49 am
Location: Philippines

Re: Suggestion: Royal Full House

Postby shark_bait on Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:10 am

DaFlush wrote:Royal full house (only thing that can beat royal flush) is like:

3 hearts, 2 diamonds
2 hearts, 3 diamonds
3 spades, 2 clubs
3 clubs, 2 spades
-------------------------
Please read this :p



first of all, that would be an oxymoron. :|
second, when you say e.g. 3 hearts, 2 diamonds, are these suited connectors (e.g. 10 :h: J :h: Q :h: K :d: A :d: ) or off-suited (e.g. 2 :h: 8 :h: K :h: 7 :d: A :d: )? if what you meant was off-suited, i believe that it poses no challenge to the game. and even if it's the like of the first example, i think that the royal flush is still much harder to obtain, which is why it's considered as the highest ranking hand of the game (/me still has 1 RF crown up to now :? )

no offense bro, your idea sounds innovative, but i think that it's not best suited to this type of game. you may want to invent a new game though with that kind of hand :wink:
shark_bait
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:37 pm

Re: Suggestion: Royal Full House

Postby FatLunatic on Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:19 pm

To have a royal fullhouse is way too easy here. If you want a flush hand, you would have 52C13, where you would have 13 of the same suit to choose from 52 total cards in the deck. Then you would have to times that by 12C4, 11C3, 10C2, 9C1 & divide it by 52C5 to get the probability of gettin a flush.

Though, because you only get 13 cards of the same suit, your chances of getting there to a flush is much less than getting a royal fullhouse.

Since you have 2 suits to get from, you'd get 1/2 the deck to get there. You'd first get 52C26, which is half the deck, then 25C4.... x 21C1. The probability of getting this is much much, much too high. That's why you don't have royal fulls in poker.
FatLunatic
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:17 pm

Re: Suggestion: Royal Full House

Postby SphygmomanometeR on Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:16 am

Good day :wink:

Wheew what a probability sort of explaination...good job Fatlunatic...but still i couldn't get the explaination why should 2s and 3s can beat the Royal Flush!!!!

More Power :s: :h: :d: :c:
"Don't take life so seriously....have FUN...ENJOY every minute of it"
User avatar
SphygmomanometeR
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:49 am
Location: Philippines

Re: Suggestion: Royal Full House

Postby FatLunatic on Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:57 pm

Lol, that stuff freshly learned from university on combinatorics. I already forgot 1/2 of it hahahahaha.
FatLunatic
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:17 pm


Return to Triplejack Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests